Bitcoin has a reduced risk of collapse Unlike traditional currencies that rely on governments. When currencies fall, it contributes to hyperinflation or the wipeout of one’s savings in an instant. Bitcoin exchange rate is not controlled by any government and is a digital money available globally.
Bitcoin isn’t hard to carry. A billion Dollars in the Bitcoin can be saved in a memory stick and placed in one’s pocket. It’s that simple to transport Bitcoins compared to paper cash.
The general Notion is that Bitcoins Are ‘mined’… intriguing term here… by solving a hard mathematical formula -harder as more Bitcoins are ‘mined’ into existence; yet again interesting- on a computer. Once established, the new Bitcoin is set into an electronic ‘wallet’. It’s then feasible to exchange actual goods or Fiat currency for Bitcoins… and vice versa. Furthermore, as there’s no central issuer of Bitcoins, it’s all highly dispersed, thus resistant to being ‘managed’ by jurisdiction.
Naturally proponents of Bitcoin, Those who benefit from the development of Bitcoin, insist rather loudly that ‘for certain, Bitcoin is money’… and not only that, but ‘it’s the best money , the cash of their future’, etc.. . The proponents of Fiat shout just as loudly that paper money is cash… and most of us know that Fiat paper isn’t money by any means, as it lacks the most important attributes of genuine cash. The question then is does Bitcoin even qualify as cash… not mind it being the cash of the near future, or the best money ever.
Compared to Fiat, Bitcoin doesn’t Do too badly as a medium of exchange. Fiat is only accepted in the geographical domain of its own issuer. Dollars are no good in Europe etc.. Bitcoin is approved internationally. On the other hand, very few retailers now accept payment in Bitcoin. Unless the acceptance grows geometrically, Fiat wins… although at the cost of trade between nations.
The primary condition is a great deal Tougher; money has to be a stable store of value… today Bitcoins have gone out of a ‘value’ of $3.00 to around $1,000, in only a couple years. That is about as far away from being a ‘stable store of value’; as you can get! Indeed, such gains are an ideal example of a speculative boom… such as Dutch tulip bulbs, or junior mining companies, or Nortel stocks. The effects of bitcoin revolution app, not only on you but many others, is a fact that has to be acknowledged. We do understand very well that your situation is vital and matters a great deal. We will begin the rest of our discussion right away, but sometimes you have to stop and let things sink in a little bit. After all we have read, this is timely and powerful information that should be regarded. The balance of this document is not to be overlooked since it can make a huge difference.
Of course, Fiat fails here as well; As an example, the US Dollar, the ‘primary’ Fiat, has lost over 95 percent of its value in a couple of decades… neither fiat nor Bitcoin qualify in the most crucial measure of money; the capacity to store value and preserve value through time. Real money, which is Gold, has shown the capacity to hold value not just for centuries, but for eons. Neither Fiat nor Bitcoin has this critical capacity… both neglect as money.
Finally, we come to the next Attribute; that of being the numeraire. Now this is actually interesting, and we can see why the two Bitcoin and Fiat neglect as money, by looking closely at the question of the ‘numeraire’. Numeraire refers to the usage of cash to not only store worth, but to in a sense measure, or compare worth. In Austrian economics, it is deemed impossible to actually quantify value; after all, value resides just in human consciousness… and how can anything else in consciousness really be measured? But through the principle of Mengerian market action, that’s interaction between bid and offer, market prices can be established… if just briefly… and this market price is expressed concerning the numeraire, the most marketable good, that’s money.
So how do we set the value of Fiat… ? Through the concept of ‘buying power’… which is, the value of Fiat depends upon what it can be exchanged for… a so called ‘basket of goods’. However, his clearly implies that Fiat has no significance of its own, rather value flows from the value of the goods and services it might be traded for. Causality flows from the goods ‘bought’ to the Fiat number. After all, what difference is there between a 1 Dollar invoice and a hundred Dollar invoice, except that the number printed on it… along with the purchasing power of this number?